SCI申诉信写法

审稿人虽然权威，但也不是万能，偶尔也会逻辑混乱，出现错误！明显的审稿人错误，我们必须提出申诉，目的是让编辑再给一次机会，当然我们必须以理服人：

Dear Dr. or Prof. XXXX (family name of the Editor or Editor-in-Chief who issued the decision
letter),
Thank you for your efficient work in processing our manuscript entitled “XXXX (title of the article)” (Manuscript No: XXXX).

After we have carefully read the comments from the reviewers, we realize that the major merits of our work were not fully identified or recognized by the reviewers. (If one or more reviewers pointed out the merits of the study, but criticized the language and presentation of the manuscript, then you should state that: After we have carefully read the comments from the reviewers, we realize that the major merits of our work have been identified or recognized by the reviewers. We believe that the major critical issue for our manuscript is the poor preparation of the manuscript, which can be improved by a native speaker or a professional editing company.)
Here we would emphasize that the most notable merits of our manuscript include:
1)
2)

3)
I had opportunities to talk to Dr. XXX (of XXX University), and Dr. XXX (XXX University), andboth of them read the manuscript and encourage me to write to you to ask if you could consider a revised version of the manuscript. (this should be included in the letter only if you have done so.Otherwise, this paragraph is not required.).
Point-by-point responses to the reviewers’ comments are enclosed after the letter for yourconsideration.
In addition, this manuscript has been edited and proofread by Medjaden Bioscience Limited.

I will be most grateful if you could offer us a second opportunity (or an additional opportunity if
the rejected manuscript is already a revised one).

Look forward to hearing from you soon,

With kind regards,

Yours sincerely,

XXXX (name of the corresponding author)
XXX (title of the corresponding author)
Corresponding author

We would like to express our sincere thanks to the reviewers for the constructive and positive
comments.

Replies to Reviewer 1
XXXX (Point by point responses to the comments of reviewer 1).

Replies to Reviewer 2
XXXX (Point by point responses to the comments of reviewer 2).